본문으로 건너뛰기

SOP Standards & Guidelines

Documentation and guidelines for creating, maintaining, and reviewing SOPs.

Available Standards

SOP Writing Guide

Comprehensive guide to writing high-quality, actionable SOPs. Covers structure, style, testing, and maintenance.

Use this when:

  • Creating a new SOP from scratch
  • Reviewing/improving an existing SOP
  • Training new SOP authors

Numbering Convention

SOP ID assignment rules and ranges.

RangeDepartmentCategory
001-0992000atelierDesign (001-009), Pattern (010-019), Production (020-029)
100-199Brand OpsSales (100-109), Marketing (110-119)
200-299Corp OpsHR (200-209), Finance (210-219), Admin (220-229)
300-399ReservedFuture expansion

Rules:

  • Never reuse retired SOP IDs
  • When range full, expand to next hundred (e.g., 001-199 → 001-299)
  • Cross-departmental processes use 900+ range

Review Process

Annual and triggered review requirements.

Annual Review Cycle:

  • Q1: Corp Ops SOPs (HR, Finance)
  • Q2: Brand Ops SOPs (Sales, Marketing)
  • Q3: 2000atelier SOPs (Design, Pattern)
  • Q4: 2000atelier SOPs (Production, QA)

Triggered Reviews:

  • Process failure (SOP led to error)
  • Major system change (new software, equipment)
  • Org restructure (new roles, departments)
  • Repeated questions (unclear section)

Review Checklist:

  • Process still current (no outdated steps)
  • Tools/systems accurate (software hasn't changed)
  • Roles correct (org structure current)
  • Metrics relevant (targets adjusted)
  • Quality gates realistic (achievable standards)

SOP Lifecycle States

StatusDefinitionNext Action
DraftInitial creation, not yet reviewedSubmit for SME review
ReviewUnder stakeholder reviewAddress feedback, revise
ActiveApproved and in useExecute process per SOP
RevisedUpdates in progressComplete revisions, re-review
ArchivedSuperseded or deprecatedReference only, do not execute

Quality Standards

All SOPs must meet these minimum quality criteria:

Structure

  • All required sections present (see SOP Writing Guide)
  • RABSIC matrix complete with exactly ONE Accountable
  • Step-by-step procedure with objective action steps
  • Quality checkpoints with pass/fail criteria

Content

  • Actions specific and executable (no vague instructions)
  • Decision logic clear (IF-THEN-ELSE statements)
  • Roles position-based (not individual names)
  • Timelines realistic (verified by SME)

Usability

  • Comprehension test passed (unfamiliar person can execute)
  • Completeness test passed (no missing information)
  • Accuracy test passed (SME verified technical correctness)

Resources

  • Template: SOP Template
  • Examples: See By Department for reference SOPs
  • Support: Contact Operations Manager for SOP creation assistance

Owner: Operations Manager Last Updated: 2026-02-02 Next Review: 2027-02-02