Strategy Responsibilities
The Strategy function guides Kyndof's strategic direction through clear accountability using the RABSIC framework. This page defines who owns what strategic decisions and how strategy coordinates with other functions to ensure analytical rigor informs leadership choices.
Strategy Lead
RABSIC: A (Accountable)
The Strategy Lead owns the strategic planning process and the quality of strategic recommendations provided to leadership. When strategic plans fail to provide clear direction, when business cases prove unrealistic, or when strategic initiatives stall—the Strategy Lead is accountable.
Strategic planning accountability means ensuring Kyndof has current, actionable strategic direction. The Strategy Lead designs and facilitates annual planning cycles that engage cross-functional input, evaluate strategic options rigorously, and produce strategic priorities leadership can approve with confidence.
Recommendation quality ownership requires maintaining high analytical standards. Strategic recommendations must be grounded in market reality, honest about assumptions and uncertainty, and practical given operational constraints. The Strategy Lead doesn't make strategic decisions—leadership does—but owns the analysis that informs those decisions.
Strategic initiative oversight means coordinating cross-functional efforts that implement strategic priorities. Once leadership commits to strategic direction, the Strategy Lead often architects major initiatives, defines success criteria, assigns RABSIC roles, and tracks execution progress. Strategic intent must translate into operational reality.
Cross-functional strategic counsel involves advising department leaders on how strategic priorities affect their functions. When sales considers new market entry, when operations evaluates capacity investments, or when finance structures pricing strategy—the Strategy Lead provides strategic perspective that ensures functional decisions align with overall direction.
Leadership advisory role includes serving as thought partner to the CEO and executive team on strategic questions. The Strategy Lead brings analytical frameworks, competitive intelligence, and market insights to strategic discussions. Strong advisory requires both analytical rigor and business judgment developed through deep organizational understanding.
Strategic Analyst
RABSIC: R (Responsible)
The Strategic Analyst executes market research, competitive intelligence, and strategic analysis. This role transforms raw data and market signals into actionable insights that inform strategic decisions.
Market sizing and analysis responsibility includes researching total addressable markets, growth rates, customer segments, and demand drivers. When leadership asks "How big is this opportunity?" the Strategic Analyst conducts research to answer with reasonable confidence bounds.
Competitive intelligence gathering means systematically tracking competitor capabilities, positioning, moves, and performance. The Analyst monitors competitor social media, industry news, customer feedback mentioning competitors, and partnership announcements. This intelligence reveals competitive threats and opportunities.
Financial modeling for business cases involves building Excel/Sheets models that project revenues, costs, margins, and returns for strategic opportunities. Models must be transparent in assumptions, rigorous in logic, and flexible for sensitivity analysis. Good models illuminate which assumptions matter most.
Data analysis and visualization transforms performance data into insights. The Analyst pulls revenue data by segment, margin trends by product category, customer acquisition costs by channel—whatever metrics illuminate portfolio health and strategic performance.
Research synthesis means taking fragmented information from multiple sources and synthesizing it into coherent narratives. Market research reports, customer interviews, competitive data points, and industry trends get woven together into strategic perspectives that inform decision-making.
Presentation support involves creating slide decks and written materials that communicate strategic analysis to leadership. The Analyst distills complex analysis into clear recommendations with supporting evidence. Good strategic communication is concise, visual, and actionable.
Initiative Program Manager
RABSIC: R (Responsible)
The Initiative Program Manager coordinates cross-functional execution of strategic initiatives. This role ensures strategic priorities move from approved plans to implemented reality.
Workstream coordination means managing multiple parallel efforts within strategic initiatives. Large initiatives typically span several functions and require orchestrated timing. The Program Manager maintains initiative roadmaps showing dependencies and sequencing.
Progress tracking involves monitoring milestone completion, deliverable quality, and timeline adherence across workstreams. The Program Manager maintains initiative status dashboards that provide leadership visibility into execution progress.
Blocker escalation happens when initiatives encounter obstacles requiring leadership intervention. Resource constraints, cross-functional conflicts, external dependencies—when these blockers emerge, the Program Manager escalates to appropriate decision-makers rather than letting initiatives stall.
Stakeholder communication keeps affected parties informed of initiative progress and decisions. Regular update meetings, status reports, and change notifications ensure everyone understands current state and upcoming changes.
Documentation responsibility includes maintaining initiative charters, decision logs, and lessons learned. Good documentation enables initiative continuity when team members change and provides learning for future initiatives.
Process improvement for initiative management means refining how Kyndof executes strategic projects. The Program Manager identifies procedural improvements that make future initiatives run more smoothly.
Cross-Functional RABSIC Relationships
Finance Team (Consulted)
Finance is consulted on business case financial modeling and validation. Strategy develops revenue and cost projections; Finance validates assumptions against historical patterns, provides cost structure data, and tests model logic. This partnership ensures financial rigor in strategic analysis.
Finance is also consulted on portfolio profitability analysis. Strategy examines strategic performance across segments; Finance provides detailed margin data and profitability metrics that inform analysis.
Budget planning involves Finance and Strategy collaborating on resource allocation. Strategy recommends investment priorities based on strategic direction; Finance evaluates budget feasibility and helps prioritize within resource constraints.
Sales Team (Consulted)
Sales provides critical market intelligence that grounds strategy in customer reality. What are clients requesting that we don't offer? What competitive threats are sales hearing about? Which market segments show strongest demand signals? This frontline intelligence informs strategic analysis.
Client segmentation strategy development involves sales consultation. Strategy proposes segment frameworks based on analysis; Sales validates whether proposed segments match actual customer behaviors and relationship dynamics.
Market expansion evaluations require sales input on go-to-market feasibility. Strategy identifies attractive markets; Sales assesses our ability to access those markets through existing relationships or new business development.
Operations Team (Consulted)
Operations is consulted on capability constraints that affect strategic feasibility. Strategy might identify attractive opportunities that require operational capabilities we don't have. Operations input helps strategy distinguish between opportunities we can pursue with current capabilities versus those requiring significant capability investments.
Capacity planning discussions involve operations providing current and planned capacity levels. Strategy needs this information to assess how much growth our operational infrastructure can support.
Innovation possibilities flow from operations to strategy. Operations teams often identify process improvements or capability enhancements that could become competitive advantages. Strategy evaluates which operational innovations warrant strategic emphasis.
Design Team (Consulted)
Design provides insights on product innovation possibilities and customer requirements. When Strategy evaluates new product opportunities, Design consultation reveals technical feasibility and creative direction.
Design trends and client preferences from design team perspective inform strategic analysis. Design's view of where fashion and styling are heading complements merchandising's market trend research.
Leadership (Accountable for Final Decisions)
Leadership is accountable for final strategic decisions but depends on Strategy's analytical process. The Strategy Lead presents options with recommendations; leadership chooses among options based on strategy's analysis plus their judgment on risk tolerance, timing, and organizational readiness.
Leadership provides strategic context that shapes analysis. Corporate risk tolerance, investor expectations, board priorities—these factors guide what strategic options are realistically acceptable.
Regular strategic reviews with leadership ensure ongoing alignment. Quarterly business reviews assess performance against strategic objectives and trigger course corrections when needed.
All Functions (Informed)
All functions are informed of strategic priorities once leadership approves them. Understanding strategic direction helps every function make decisions aligned with overall strategy.
Strategic initiative launches include broad communication explaining the initiative's purpose, scope, timeline, and how it affects different functions. Clear communication prevents surprises and builds organizational buy-in.
Decision-Making Flows
Strategic Direction Decisions (Annual Plan, Strategic Priorities, Major Pivots)
Accountable: CEO, Executive Team Responsible: Strategy Lead (analysis and recommendation) Consulted: All functions (input on opportunities, constraints, and implications) Informed: Entire organization (final approved strategy)
Strategic direction decisions start with Strategy Lead-facilitated analysis. The Strategy team gathers market data, competitive intelligence, and cross-functional input. They evaluate strategic options, develop business cases, and formulate recommendations.
Extensive consultation happens before recommendations finalize. Finance validates financial assumptions. Sales provides market reality checks. Operations confirms capability feasibility. Design informs product direction possibilities.
Leadership reviews strategy recommendations and makes final decisions on strategic priorities. Sometimes leadership accepts recommendations. Sometimes they choose different options or request additional analysis. Leadership accountability means they own the final call.
Once decided, strategic direction is communicated organization-wide so all functions understand priorities guiding their work.
Business Case Decisions (New Markets, Products, Investments)
Accountable: CEO or relevant Functional Leader (depending on scope) Responsible: Strategy Lead (business case development) Consulted: Finance, relevant functions Informed: Affected functions
Business case decisions follow rigorous analytical process led by Strategy. The Strategic Analyst conducts market research and builds financial models. The Strategy Lead synthesizes analysis into business case recommendations.
Finance consultation validates financial projections and evaluates returns relative to other investment options. Relevant functional leaders provide implementation feasibility input.
The CEO makes final decisions on major cross-functional opportunities. Functional leaders decide on function-specific investments within their authority. Strategy provides analysis; decision-makers choose whether to proceed.
Affected functions are informed of approved business cases so they can prepare for implementation.
Strategic Initiative Decisions (Scope, Resourcing, Timing)
Accountable: Initiative Sponsor (typically functional leader or CEO) Responsible: Initiative Program Manager (coordination and execution) Consulted: Workstream leads from affected functions Informed: All stakeholders
Strategic initiatives require clear sponsor accountability. The sponsor approves scope, commits resources, and resolves escalated decisions. The Initiative Program Manager handles day-to-day coordination but escalates significant decisions to the sponsor.
Workstream leads are consulted on detailed plans, resource requirements, and timeline feasibility. Their functional expertise shapes how initiatives get executed.
All stakeholders are informed of initiative progress, changes, and decisions through regular status updates.
Metrics Ownership
Each strategy role owns specific metrics tracking performance:
Strategy Lead: Strategic plan completion timeliness, decision support quality (% of major decisions with strategy analysis), strategic alignment scores from cross-functional feedback
Strategic Analyst: Market forecast accuracy (projections vs. actuals), research quality (stakeholder satisfaction with analysis), competitive intelligence coverage (% of key competitors tracked)
Initiative Program Manager: Initiative on-time completion rate (70%+ target), initiative success rate (objectives achieved), stakeholder satisfaction with initiative coordination
These metrics balance process quality (did we do strategy work well?) with outcome impact (did strategy make a difference?).
Strategic Mindset
Effective strategy work requires particular thinking patterns:
Analytical rigor balanced with judgment: Strategy demands both quantitative analysis and qualitative assessment. Not everything that matters is measurable. Good strategists blend hard data with soft insights.
Comfort with ambiguity: Strategic decisions involve uncertainty. Markets shift. Competitors react. Customers surprise us. Strategy must acknowledge uncertainty rather than pretending to eliminate it.
Systems thinking: Strategic choices create ripple effects across the organization. Strategy must anticipate second and third-order consequences, not just immediate impacts.
Intellectual honesty: The worst strategy work manufactures justifications for predetermined conclusions. Good strategy presents inconvenient truths when reality doesn't match preferences.
Practical focus: Strategy that can't be executed is worthless. Good strategy is grounded in operational reality and designed for actual implementation.